Price (90d)
$57.50Signal Score (90d)
159Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0.00 | $21.31M | $40.90 |
| 2024 | $0.00 | $2.17M | $4.42 |
| 2023 | $0.00 | $-129.0K | $-0.00 |
| 2022 | $0.00 | $-18.0K | $-0.03 |
| 2021 | $0.00 | $-2.11M | $-0.00 |
Social Signal Score
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.06
- Implied price
- $1.12
- Return from $58.48
- -54.7% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $0.55 — -99.1% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -62.1% | -60.4% | -58.9% | -57.6% | -56.5% |
| 3.0% | -60.2% | -58.3% | -56.8% | -55.4% | -54.2% |
| 8.0% | -58.2% | -56.3% | -54.7% | -53.3% | -52.0% |
| 13.0% | -56.3% | -54.3% | -52.6% | -51.1% | -49.8% |
| 18.0% | -54.4% | -52.3% | -50.5% | -49.0% | -47.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (4)
- 4chan /biz/biz·17h ago·Neutral
>>62595154 >>62595169 They do everything they can to create fake paper silver to help absorb demand. SLV is what they put in people's "portfolios". What else is SLV other than some sort of "fractional reserve" pool of silver? aka another form of "trust me bro, everything's fine" credit? It's not like this is some "blip" that the world gets over. The bond market is $46TN in size and every dollar someone put into it is a dollar someone intends to spend. The system likes it best when you cash in f…
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·18h ago·Positive
>>62595137 >To assume holding 36.6 ozt would put you in the top 1% of all who have silver is probably wrong, though no comprehensive survey of silver holdings has not been taken, nor likely ever will. it's correct because most people are lemmings and would buy SLV instead of physical silver.
View source ↗ - News (RSS)seekingalpha·21h ago·Neutral
SLV ETF: Silver's Role As Fiat Currency Backing Asset Emerging
View source ↗ - Newsfool.com·7d ago·Neutral
SLV vs GDX: Is a Silver ETF a Better Buy Than a Gold Miner Fund in 2026? The iShares Silver Trust provides direct exposure to physical silver bullion, while the VanEck Gold Miners ETF invests in companies that extract gold. The iShares Silver Trust has delivered significantly higher total returns over the trailing 12 months but has historically experienced a deeper maximum drawdown.
View source ↗