Price
No data yet.
Revenue
$0.00Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Kevin McGurn
- Sector
- Consumer Cyclical
- Industry
- Auto - Manufacturers
- Employees
- 15
- Beta
- 9.59
- Country
- DE
- Piotroski score
- 3 / 9 (Weak)
- Altman Z-score
- -101.03
Financials
Revenue
$0.00-100.0%Net Income
$-2.30MEBITDA
$-1.22MFree Cash Flow
$5.11M-14.4%EPS (diluted)
$-2.22Shares Outstanding (diluted)
1.46M+227.1%Operating Expenses
$1.23MCash & Debt
$145.1KQuote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $149.0K | $4.01M | $2.65 |
| 2024 | $0.00 | $65.03M | $44.86 |
| 2023 | $42.0K | $-45.71M | $-31.99 |
| 2022 | $229.0K | $-183.70M | $-165.75 |
| 2021 | $16.0K | $-63.95M | $-80.25 |
| 2020 | $0.00 | $-56.03M | $-72.85 |
| 2019 | $0.00 | $-9.83M | $-13.15 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $4.05
- Implied price
- $72.89
- Return from $1.59
- 114.9% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $36.24 — today's price is already 95.6% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | 79.8% | 88.0% | 95.0% | 101.1% | 106.6% |
| 3.0% | 89.0% | 97.6% | 105.0% | 111.4% | 117.1% |
| 8.0% | 98.2% | 107.2% | 114.9% | 121.6% | 127.6% |
| 13.0% | 107.3% | 116.8% | 124.9% | 131.9% | 138.2% |
| 18.0% | 116.5% | 126.4% | 134.8% | 142.2% | 148.7% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
Not enough mention history yet to chart a trend.
Earnings
Wed, Nov 18(in 6 weeks)
Typical surprise +63.8% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Nov 19$-1.11 vs $-0.88miss
- Tue, Aug 19$-0.64 vs $-1.77beat
- Tue, May 20$6.10 vs $-3.25beat
Estimates and results for SSM via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by SSM officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $118k
0 trades
17 trades
- Bambino 255 V V Ug Haftungsbeschranktsold
- Bambino 255 V V Ug Haftungsbeschranktsold
- Bambino 255 V V Ug Haftungsbeschranktsold
- Bambino 255 V V Ug Haftungsbeschranktsold
- Bambino 255 V V Ug Haftungsbeschranktsold
- Bambino 255 V V Ug Haftungsbeschranktsold
- Bambino 255 V V Ug Haftungsbeschranktsold
- Bambino 255 V V Ug Haftungsbeschranktsold
3 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Congress trades
No disclosed congressional trades in SSM.
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.