Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$758.38M-47.48%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Bangxin Zhang
- Sector
- Consumer Defensive
- Industry
- Education & Training Services
- Employees
- 26,100
- Beta
- 0.07
- Country
- CN
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 2.74
Financials
Revenue
$758.38M-47.5%Net Income
$408.01MEBITDA
$137.20MFree Cash Flow
—EPS (diluted)
$2.19Shares Outstanding (diluted)
186.31M+163.6%Operating Expenses
$301.00MCash & Debt
$2.87BReturn of Capital
$0.00Revenue by Segment (annual)
$4.39BDividend per Share
$0.08Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $3.02B | $532.73M | $2.79 |
| 2025 | $2.25B | $84.59M | $1.26 |
| 2024 | $1.49B | $-3.57M | $-0.06 |
| 2023 | $1.02B | $-135.12M | $-1.92 |
| 2022 | $4.40B | $-1.14B | $-15.90 |
| 2021 | $4.51B | $-116.35M | $-1.71 |
| 2020 | $3.27B | $-110.17M | $-1.83 |
| 2019 | $2.56B | $366.65M | $5.67 |
| 2018 | $1.72B | $199.56M | $3.51 |
| 2017 | $1.04B | $116.66M | $2.14 |
| 2016 | $619.94M | $102.88M | $1.87 |
| 2015 | $433.97M | $67.16M | $1.25 |
| 2014 | $313.90M | $60.61M | $1.16 |
| 2013 | $225.93M | $33.44M | $0.64 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from TAL's reported EPS growth of 12.0% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $4.93
- Implied price
- $19.72
- Return from $11.47
- 11.4% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $9.81 — -14.5% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0% | — | -11.6% | 1.5% | 10.1% | 16.6% |
| 7.0% | — | -7.3% | 6.5% | 15.5% | 22.3% |
| 12.0% | — | -3.0% | 11.4% | 20.9% | 28.0% |
| 17.0% | — | 1.4% | 16.4% | 26.3% | 33.7% |
| 22.0% | — | 5.7% | 21.4% | 31.7% | 39.5% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
115Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newsgurufocus.com·6h ago·Positive
Is TAL Education Group (TAL) a Bargain After 5.4% Drop? GF Value Says Undervalued On August 20, 2026, TAL Education Group (TAL) shares fell 5.4% to $11.47, reflecting a volatile trading environment. The stock has fluctuated within a 52-week r
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·13h ago·Neutral
TAL vs. LAUR: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option? Investors interested in Schools stocks are likely familiar with TAL Education (TAL) and Laureate Education (LAUR). But which of these two stocks offers value investors a better bang for their buck right now?
View source ↗
Earnings
Thu, Oct 29(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.13 per share
Typical surprise +50.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Jul 30$0.75 vs $0.16beat
- Thu, Apr 23$0.45 vs $0.22beat
- Thu, Jan 29$0.25 vs $0.08beat
- Thu, Oct 30$0.24 vs $0.16beat
- Thu, Jul 31$0.07 vs $0.07miss
- Thu, Apr 24$0.01 vs $0.07miss
Estimates and results for TAL via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by TAL officers and directors.
- Bought
- $117k
- Sold
- $10.4m
8 trades
26 trades
- Peng Alex Zhuangzhuangsold
- Peng Alex Zhuangzhuangsold
- Germain Claudebought
- Valentine Kevinsold
- Burns Johnsold
- Valentine Kevinsold
- Valentine Kevinsold
- Burns Johnsold
66 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.