Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$16.86M-12.38%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Chaohui Chen
- Sector
- Communication Services
- Industry
- Telecommunications Services
- Employees
- 429
- Beta
- 4.16
- Country
- HK
- Piotroski score
- 4 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- -2.50
Financials
Revenue
$16.86M-12.4%Net Income
$-3.49MEBITDA
$-3.47MFree Cash Flow
$-8.72MEPS (diluted)
$-1.00Shares Outstanding (diluted)
3.81M-86.6%Operating Expenses
$10.95MCash & Debt
$40.69MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$2.14MQuote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $81.66M | $6.32M | $1.70 |
| 2024 | $91.64M | $4.56M | $1.20 |
| 2023 | $85.58M | $2.81M | $0.08 |
| 2022 | $71.46M | $-19.85M | $-0.64 |
| 2021 | $73.82M | $-46.04M | $-1.60 |
| 2020 | $89.57M | $-63.41M | $-2.40 |
| 2019 | $158.38M | $5.21M | $0.18 |
| 2018 | $126.40M | $-26.56M | $-1.02 |
| 2017 | $85.84M | $-19.26M | $-1.20 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $2.45
- Implied price
- $44.14
- Return from $0.49
- 146.1% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $21.95 — today's price is already 97.8% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | 106.0% | 115.4% | 123.4% | 130.3% | 136.6% |
| 3.0% | 116.5% | 126.3% | 134.8% | 142.1% | 148.7% |
| 8.0% | 127.0% | 137.3% | 146.1% | 153.9% | 160.7% |
| 13.0% | 137.5% | 148.3% | 157.5% | 165.6% | 172.8% |
| 18.0% | 148.0% | 159.3% | 168.9% | 177.4% | 184.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
100Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·1d ago·Positive
uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·1d ago·Negative
uCloudlink Group Inc. Sponsored ADR (UCL) Reports Q2 Loss, Lags Revenue Estimates uCloudlink Group Inc. Sponsored ADR (UCL) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.08 per share versus the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $0.05. This compares to earnings of $0.02 per share a year ago.
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Nov 11(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $0.04 per share
Typical surprise -28.6% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Tue, Aug 18$-0.08 vs $-0.05miss
- Wed, May 13$-0.09 vs $-0.07miss
- Wed, Mar 18$-0.08 vs $-0.06miss
- Wed, Nov 12$0.24 vs $0.02beat
- Wed, Aug 13$0.02 vs $0.02beat
- Wed, May 21$-0.02 vs $-0.04beat
Estimates and results for UCL via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by UCL officers and directors.
- Bought
- $11k
- Sold
- —
1 trade
0 trades
- Peng Zhipingbought
99 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.