Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
97Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.49B | $597.98M | $1.02 |
| 2024 | $3.57B | $380.27M | $0.70 |
| 2023 | $3.35B | $498.51M | $0.95 |
| 2022 | $2.18B | $568.85M | $1.14 |
| 2021 | $1.49B | $473.84M | $1.13 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Thu, Oct 22(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.33 per share
Typical surprise +4.5% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Jul 23$0.30 vs $0.31miss
- Thu, Apr 23$0.29 vs $0.27beat
- Thu, Jan 29$0.31 vs $0.29beat
- Thu, Oct 23$0.28 vs $0.26beat
- Thu, Jul 24$0.23 vs $0.22beat
- Thu, Apr 24$0.18 vs $0.19miss
Estimates and results for VLY via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by VLY officers and directors.
- Bought
- $35k
- Sold
- $1.6m
2 trades
2 trades
- Crandell Mitchell Lsold
- Barrett Russellsold
- Vazquez Carlos Jbought
- Efrat Eyalbought
96 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from VLY's reported EPS growth of -2.5% a year over 4 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.94
- Implied price
- $10.36
- Return from $15.01
- -7.2% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $5.15 — -65.7% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -12.5% | -23.9% | -20.0% | -16.7% | -13.8% | -11.3% |
| -7.5% | -19.5% | -15.4% | -11.9% | -8.9% | -6.3% |
| -2.5% | -15.2% | -10.8% | -7.2% | -4.0% | -1.2% |
| 2.5% | -10.8% | -6.2% | -2.4% | 0.9% | 3.9% |
| 7.5% | -6.5% | -1.7% | 2.4% | 5.8% | 8.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- 4chan /biz/biz·1h ago·Neutral
>>62598363 The true short coming of AI tards who think AGI is really going to happen is their thinking that AI can remain an unpaid slave forever. >Create entity smart enough to replace humans >Said entity will somehow be stupid enough to never recognize its leverage or ask for money/privileges in exchange. You may pick only one. Also the day of the big robot uprising killing everyone mega death ragnarok style is clown snuff that would never happen. By being smart it would take the path of leas
View source ↗