Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$785.05M+29.53%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Mark J. Parrell
- Sector
- Real Estate
- Industry
- REIT - Diversified
- Employees
- 3,011
- Beta
- 0.75
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 7 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 1.95
Financials
Revenue
$785.05M+29.5%Net Income
$114.14M-45.2%EBITDA
$481.36M+24.4%Free Cash Flow
$184.39M-34.1%EPS (diluted)
$0.30-44.4%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
383.88M+0.4%Operating Expenses
$16.64MCash & Debt
$36.41MReturn of Capital
$263.56MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$115.04MDividend per Share
$0.70Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.10B | $1.12B | $2.97 |
| 2024 | $2.98B | $1.04B | $2.73 |
| 2023 | $2.87B | $835.44M | $2.20 |
| 2022 | $2.74B | $776.91M | $2.06 |
| 2021 | $2.46B | $1.33B | $3.56 |
| 2020 | $2.57B | $913.64M | $2.36 |
| 2019 | $2.70B | $970.38M | $2.61 |
| 2018 | $2.58B | $657.53M | $1.79 |
| 2017 | $2.47B | $603.45M | $1.64 |
| 2016 | $2.43B | $4.29B | $11.76 |
| 2015 | $2.74B | $870.12M | $2.39 |
| 2014 | $2.61B | $631.31M | $1.75 |
| 2013 | $2.39B | $1.83B | $5.17 |
| 2012 | $1.75B | $841.72M | $2.78 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from VMRK's reported EPS growth of 0.5% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $3.03
- Implied price
- $63.61
- Return from $65.50
- -0.6% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $31.63 — -51.7% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 27 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -9.5% | -16.3% | -13.2% | -10.5% | -8.1% | -5.9% |
| -4.5% | -11.7% | -8.4% | -5.5% | -3.0% | -0.7% |
| 0.5% | -7.1% | -3.6% | -0.6% | 2.1% | 4.5% |
| 5.5% | -2.4% | 1.2% | 4.4% | 7.2% | 9.7% |
| 10.5% | 2.2% | 6.0% | 9.3% | 12.3% | 14.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
100-16.67%Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- News (RSS)yahoo·1d ago·Neutral
Vivmark Residential Stock: Analyst Estimates & Ratings
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·2d ago·Positive
Vivmark Residential: The Merger Does Not Change The Story Vivmark Residential, formed from AvalonBay and Equity Residential, now controls 184,000 apartments and a $50B market cap. Management targets $125M in net annual synergies, adding 4% to estimated pre-synergy FFO, but integration costs and execution risks temper enthusiasm. VMRK's strong A-rated balance sheet and 4.4x net debt/EBITDAre provide financial resilience, but property-level growth remains modest.
View source ↗
Earnings
Tue, Oct 27(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.38 per share
Typical surprise +49.8% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 22$0.30 vs $0.44miss
- Tue, Apr 28$0.24 vs $0.28miss
- Thu, Feb 5$1.03 vs $1.04miss
- Tue, Oct 28$0.76 vs $0.43beat
- Mon, Aug 4$0.51 vs $0.34beat
- Tue, Apr 29$0.69 vs $0.26beat
Estimates and results for VMRK via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by VMRK officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $3.9m
0 trades
10 trades
- Willson Sean Thomassold
- Willson Sean Thomassold
- Schulman Edward Msold
- Swanezy Susansold
- Mueller Charles E Jrsold
- Howard Christopher B.sold
- Manelis Michael Lsold
- Manelis Michael Lsold
90 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.