Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$93.83M+85.42%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Edward Otis Handy
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Banks - Regional
- Employees
- 642
- Beta
- 0.70
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 7 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- -0.71
Financials
Revenue
$93.83M+85.4%Net Income
$15.98M+29.6%EBITDA
$21.24M+9.2%Free Cash Flow
$27.56M+291.1%EPS (diluted)
$0.83+15.3%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
19.20M+11.6%Operating Expenses
$27.04MCash & Debt
$26.44MReturn of Capital
$10.94MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$166.24MDividend per Share
$0.56Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $381.08M | $52.24M | $2.72 |
| 2024 | $310.78M | $-28.06M | $-1.63 |
| 2023 | $364.80M | $48.18M | $2.82 |
| 2022 | $257.07M | $71.68M | $4.14 |
| 2021 | $245.39M | $76.87M | $4.43 |
| 2020 | $269.38M | $69.83M | $4.03 |
| 2019 | $264.74M | $69.12M | $3.98 |
| 2018 | $238.52M | $68.43M | $3.96 |
| 2017 | $214.40M | $45.92M | $2.66 |
| 2016 | $198.60M | $46.48M | $2.72 |
| 2015 | $184.09M | $43.47M | $2.57 |
| 2014 | $173.09M | $40.82M | $2.44 |
| 2013 | $169.85M | $36.15M | $2.18 |
| 2012 | $177.49M | $35.07M | $2.13 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from WASH's reported EPS growth of 1.9% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $2.99
- Implied price
- $32.92
- Return from $39.39
- -3.5% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $16.37 — -58.4% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -8.1% | -20.5% | -16.4% | -13.0% | -10.0% | -7.4% |
| -3.1% | -16.2% | -11.9% | -8.3% | -5.1% | -2.4% |
| 1.9% | -11.9% | -7.3% | -3.5% | -0.2% | 2.6% |
| 6.9% | -7.5% | -2.8% | 1.2% | 4.6% | 7.7% |
| 11.9% | -3.2% | 1.8% | 5.9% | 9.5% | 12.7% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
100+25.00%Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newszacks.com·5h ago·Neutral
WASH vs. CBC: Which Stock Should Value Investors Buy Now? Investors with an interest in Banks - Northeast stocks have likely encountered both Washington Trust Bancorp (WASH) and Central Bancompany (CBC). But which of these two stocks presents investors with the better value opportunity right now?
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·7d ago·Negative
Is the Options Market Predicting a Spike in Washington Trust Stock? Investors need to pay close attention to WASH stock based on the movements in the options market lately.
View source ↗
Earnings
Mon, Oct 19(in 6 weeks)
Consensus estimate $0.87 per share
Typical surprise +7.9% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Mon, Jul 20$0.83 vs $0.77beat
- Mon, Apr 20$0.66 vs $0.77miss
- Wed, Jan 28$0.83 vs $0.75beat
- Mon, Oct 20$0.56 vs $0.46beat
- Mon, Jul 21$0.68 vs $0.63beat
- Mon, Apr 21$0.61 vs $0.62miss
Estimates and results for WASH via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by WASH officers and directors.
- Bought
- $1.3m
- Sold
- $43k
6 trades
3 trades
- Handy Edward O. Iiisold
- Lora Rolando Asold
- Handy Edward O. Iiibought
- Ohsberg Ronald S.bought
- Brown James Cannonbought
- Brown James Cannonbought
- Dimuccio Robert Abought
- Ohsberg Ronald S.bought
91 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.